I actually wrote this piece a few years ago as part of a class assignment. I was reminded of it recently when I heard writer Richard Rodriguez read at the Ohio University Spring Literary festival. Rodriguez is inspiring, and so is Mike Rose's book mentioned below.
I
finish page eight of Mike Rose’s Lives on the Boundary with a pounding
in my chest, an I’m on the verge of a
huge epiphany kind of racing in my blood that demands immediate
action. Stop reading. Call your mother.
“Was
I ever labeled in high school?” I ask her. “Was I on something called a vocational track?”
“No,”
she assures me, without bothering to ask what’s fueled this latest surge of
insecurity. She is used to my
out-of-the-blue probings into the our family history, my sometimes obsessive
need to know myself, to make sure I’ve got my story down correctly.
Despite
my mother’s assurances that I was on the same “track” as everyone else, Rose’s
discussion proves what I long suspected – students are labeled in school, there are
different “tracks,” and the track they are relegated to can make all the
difference.
My upbringing was vastly
different than Rose’s; my family, despite divorce, had more opportunities, and
I was raised in a nice middle-class neighborhood in a perfectly good school
district. My experience in school,
however, is strangely more similar to Rose’s than one might imagine. I thought I had figured it out on page eight,
that the reason for some of my feelings of inadequacy throughout school – high
school especially – was that I was on a different “track” than my friends. Ok, so that wasn’t the case, but the epiphany
still smolders: I know I was still labeled,
if not by the institution itself, then by my own perceptions of what I was
capable of, of what my family and teachers expected from me.
My
troubles began in kindergarten and first grade at Baxter Elementary school in
Anchorage, Alaska. “She doesn’t listen,”
the teachers said. “She is off in her own little dream world.” “She is the
class clown.” Mrs. Troop was especially
mortifying. Not a month into first grade
and she was raging at my side, wood-pecking her ugly index finger with its
massive watch-ring on my desk. She bent
her face down so close to mine I could smell her breakfast. “Go, you naughty girl,” she said. “Go talk to Mr. Ruffle.” The Principal. When I got there I would be in trouble again;
what was I supposed to talk to him about?
Fast
forward a few months or so to the tail end of first grade. Dinnertime: “It’s you,” my mother says,
sniffing the air around me and nearly toppling out of her chair like a clown on
a two-legged barstool. “Good God, you
stink! Get down from here this instant
and get into the bath.” I hadn’t done
anything especially dirty that day, but still, I followed her command with an
eagerness that probably belied my glee at not having to finish that evening’s
vegetables. She trailed behind me with
the scrub brush. Downstairs in the
bathtub, my mother scrubbed my feet and knees and elbows with a vengeance until
they were as raw and glistening as the potatoes she had peeled for dinner. Then, coming in for my neck, the washcloth
poised to do some serious damage, she smelled it. It wasn’t me
that was molding like wet bread in a dump truck. It was my ear. The next day, the doctor explained that my
eardrum had burst. This finding didn’t explain the smell away, but there you
have it. A few weeks later, when I went
under the knife to repair my torn eardrum, the doctors found a small tumor.
They removed it. It grew back a couple of years later. They removed it
again. The crux of it all is that before
my operation, I had lost 90% of my hearing in my left ear. So, it wasn’t that I wasn’t listening in class, I just couldn’t hear!
By
third grade I had regained all but 10% of my hearing in my “bad ear,” but it
seems the damage had been done. I was
behind in my basics due to what I had misheard or missed completely, and it
seems that the adjectives that once described me followed me still: I was still
slow, a dreamer, in a world of my own.
What strikes me as sadly funny now is that I was even dumb to my own
dumbness. Not too many years ago I
berated my mother for a nickname she and my father used to call me as a child:
Dumbo. “I walked around for years
self-conscious about the size of my ears,” I told her. “Why do you think I got so upset when you cut
my hair short?” My mother laughed:
“Stupid,” she said, not unkindly, “we didn’t call you Dumbo because your ears
were big; it was because you were dumb!”
A fine beginning.
Subtle feelings of inadequacy
followed me to high school. While I did
well in English, I struggled in all my other subjects. My friends, it seemed, were taking harder
classes, doing more. Where I was
expected to graduate with one Science class, they were taking two; I had one
year of Spanish, they had two. Where I had Algebra, they had Trigonometry. They were taking “college prep” courses, they
said. But what was I being prepped
for? I don’t remember ever sitting down
with an advisor. So who decided I didn’t
need to be prepped for college? Who assumed I wouldn’t be going? Test results? My parents? I still don’t know. Remember that survey/test we took that tried
to guide us towards our future careers? Mine said I was not suited for further
academic pursuits. Slinging pizzas. Making babies. According to the exam there
wasn’t much more in my future than that.
Damn; I had already had my heart set on teaching.
While I did graduate high
school with four years of English and extra courses in Speech, Creative
Writing, Journalism, and English 100 under my belt from the local community
college, I felt then, and still feel now, that the system gypped me along the
way. Rose writes, that “it is an unfortunate fact of our
psychic lives that the images that surround us as we grow up – no matter how
much we may scorn them later – give shape to our deepest needs and
longings”(44). That survey, the labels,
that trip to the principal’s office: these are the memories that have made me.
What
Mike Rose gives me is that reminder of who I
used to be, the difficulties I faced in school because of a tenuous beginning
and my own insecurities. He reminds us
all, I hope, that even if we have
survived our own various versions of classroom traumas, they may still be
unhealed wounds in the minds of our freshmen.
As we begin our new quarter, I hear and take part in the banter with
colleagues in the halls. “Yes, I have a
good group this quarter,” I hear, and I say. “A smart group, much better than
last fall.” Already we judge, and based
on what? A week of lectures? A couple of
assignments? Do we equate early
participation with intelligence and label the shy ones as “slow” or “stupid” as
we go? I don’t want to be this
person. I don’t want to forget that I
used to be on the sticky side of those labels.
In these first couple of weeks back, I have also heard stories of scare
tactics: instructors approaching their first classes with fierce tones and
frowning faces, a façade that surely deflates every student’s dream of the
classroom being an “oasis of possibility” (18).
What do we or our students gain by this strong-arming, us-against-them
approach? If I were mentoring my peers I would strongly caution against it.
After a couple days of their snickering, of their questioning and perhaps
testing our authority (and this generally comes from only one or two students
whom we perceive through our own insecurities to be representative of the whole), things generally quiet down. We can growl all we want, but we won’t gain
their respect or confidence until we prove we actually have something to teach them.
To
move abruptly again from the teacher I am to the student I was, I’ll close here
by noting that the end of my own story in education is an ironic one. The kid who wasn’t encouraged by the system
to engage in academic pursuits has become a collector of diplomas: BA, MA, MFA, PhD. And I am not immune to the implications here:
through education I measure my worth. Despite the degrees on my wall, however,
despite my bookcase of publications, despite now, in 2012, being a year away from tenure, I, like Rose, and perhaps like many of my
students, feel destined to continuously wonder – am I “the real thing or
not?”(61).




2 comments:
Thank you Prof. Haugen for sharing this very personal and intimate story. It made me remember many things from my own past while building a even further respect for you as the strong willed individual that you are.
I think about my own life and how the lack of discipline that I received as a child, and how I didn't have anybody in my corner until I became an adult, and even then I have had to face a life time of expectations of underachieving. I've never been expected to be excellent in anything by my peers and family. I wasn't the smart one, or the strongest one, or the most successful one. I was the youngest, the most neglected in many areas. I was spoiled and payed of with toys and stuff, that is when we weren't too poor to buy anything. All of this came to me.
I am so impressed of you facing all of your hurdles, yet gaining the last word. You have triumphed and are a story of success in all tenses of the word. You represent the greatness that mankind is able to achieve regardless of our childhood environments. And as one of your students, it gives me hope of my own future. Thank you Prof. Haugen, I am grateful to you.
Thanks for these comments, Paul. I don't want to give the impression that my childhood was a hurdle; certainly my family has been behind me in all my life choices, and I would never be where I'm at today without their support. I know that others have had a much tougher road, but I want to encourage everyone to follow their bliss, regardless of the messages they receive that say they can't. You are clearly passing this message along to your daughter in your own successes as well!
Post a Comment